Archives par mot-clé : Proust et Merleau-Ponty

Merleau-Ponty, Starobinski et Proust | Réunion du Cercle d’études Starobinski | Lausanne | 20 nov. 2025

Merleau-Ponty, Starobinski et Proust

Réunion du Cercle d’études Starobinski

Jeudi 20 novembre 2025, 18 h

Place Saint-François 7, 1003 Lausanne

Entrée libre sur inscription : info@c-l-l.ch

Organisation : Stéphanie Cudré-Mauroux (stephanie.cudre-mauroux@nb.admin.ch)

 

Le 20 novembre 2025, le Cercle d’études Jean Starobinski se réunira au Cercle littéraire de Lausanne pour une soirée de conférences consacrées à Jean Starobinski, Maurice Merleau-Ponty et Marcel Proust.

«Sa pensée avait valeur d’entraînement à la pensée», écrivait Jean Starobinski en 1961 à propos de Maurice Merleau-Ponty, qui venait de mourir. «L’écouter, ajoutait Starobinski, c’était cheminer avec sa parole, dans un rythme égal et ferme, qui excluait aussi bien la grisaille ratiocinante que les faciles effets de brio.» Ce que Starobinski admirait chez le philosophe, c’était une parole en mouvement, à la fois rigoureuse et ouverte, soucieuse d’autrui et du monde. Entre Paris et Genève, les deux intellectuels se sont rencontrés et ont collaboré à plusieurs reprises. Mais ce sont surtout leurs œuvres qui prennent une direction similaire, celle d’une attention portée à la dimension sensible et corporelle de la signification. Si, sous la plume de Starobinski, les références à Merleau-Ponty demeurent relati­vement discrètes, c’est que la pensée de celui-ci vaut d’abord comme modèle d’une qualité d’attention particulière. C’est celle-là que nous explorerons, en résonance avec l’œuvre de Marcel Proust, dont l’écriture partage avec ces deux intellec­tuels une même exigence : faire sentir la pensée et penser le sensible.

Cette soirée sera l’occasion d’ouvrir un dialogue entre littéra­ture, philosophie et critique littéraire. Une invitation à pour­suivre une réflexion à la croisée des disciplines, qui n’a rien perdu de son actualité.

Continuer la lecture de Merleau-Ponty, Starobinski et Proust | Réunion du Cercle d’études Starobinski | Lausanne | 20 nov. 2025

Anne Simon | Proust, entre surface et profondeur : Deleuze vs Merleau-Ponty | 7th Dauphine Phenomenology Workshop | Paris Dauphine-PSL | April 21, 2023

7th DauphinePhenomenology Workshop (DPW)

ANTI-PHENOMENOLOGIES & ORGANIZATION STUDIES

Misunderstandings, Paradoxes and Benefits of a Critique for MOS

Anne Simon : Proust, entre surface et profondeur : Deleuze vs Merleau-Ponty (conférence en français)

Paris, April, 21st 2023, 4 pm

Stockholm School of Economics (SSE) & Université Paris Dauphine-PSL

Cliquer pour se connecter à la conférence

  • Projects: https://dauphine.psl.eu/en/dauphine/news-events/article/7th-dauphine-phenomenology-worshop-dpw-2023
  • The Dauphine Phenomenology Workshop (DPW) is an annual event focused on continental philosophies and their relationships with social sciences in general, and Management and Organization Studies in particular. Although primarily interested in phenomenologies and post-phenomenologies, our agora also covers all major philosophical ventures linked to continental philosophy and post-continental philosophy and their relationships with MOS.

    This year, we would like to come back to the critique of phenomenologies in the course of the 20th centuries. Many contemporary philosophers (e.g. Bergson, Deleuze, Braidotti…) have built their thought in reaction and/or against phenomenology[1], in particular traditional orthodox phenomenology and its core concepts such as consciousness, eidetic reduction, perception and intentionality. Whereas this critique has also existed from the inside of phenomenology[2] with Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty or Arendt among others, post-modern thinkers, process philosophers and some post-Marxist have radicalized this deconstruction, which has opened the way more explicitly to an ontological reversal[3] (subjectivity is secondary to the event),  a disappearance of traditional subjectivity and subjectivation (‘indiscernible’, ‘evasive’, highly or too ‘epiphenomenal’) but also more questionable critiques in view of the directions of non-orthodox phenomenologies, post-phenomenologies or more qualified interpretations of Husserl’s work.

    In the context of this 6th Dauphine Phenomenology, we would like to explore the possibility of these critiques, paradoxes and sometimes, misreadings about phenomenologies and post-phenomenologies. We would like to build a conversation between phenomenologists, post-phenomenologists (discontinuing phenomenological core but claiming to stay in a form of phenomenological venture) and anti-phenomenologists (building an alternative in reaction and against phenomenology). In views of recent research such as those of Michel Foucault, Judith Revel, Peter Sloderdijk, Petr Praesek, Giambo Agamben or Judith Butler, continuities, interweaving and synergies may be much more important than enacted by some historiographies of the 60s, 70s and 80s have defended.

    We want to explore here these issues and draw implications for Management and Organizations Studies. Discussions about the following topics will be particularly (but not exclusively) appreciated:

     

    • Ethics and morality of organizing;
    • Subjectivation, ethos and agentivity from the inside of organizing;
    • Identity, multiple selves and organizing;
    • Multiplicity and organizing;
    • Materiality, digitality and organizing;
    • Materiality, becoming and organizing;
    • Art and art-based research;
    • Aesthetics and organizing;
    • Spacing and emplacement at stake in organizing;
    • Atmosphere and affects in organizing;
    • Strategy and strategizing as experiences;
    • Opening and oppresses of organizing;
    • Project management and project dynamics;
    • Entrepreneurial processes and entrepreneurial events.

     

    CFP6thDPW_Antiphenomenologiesv9 – Extended abstracts (max 1000 words) should be submitted at dauphinephenomenology@gmail.com before February, 10th 2023 midnight CET.

     

    Scientific committee:

    Léo Bancou (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL), Lucie Chartouny (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL), Marion Beauvalet (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL), Sylvain Colombero (Grenoble Ecole de Management), Xavier Deroy (Neoma Business School), Albane Grandazzi (Grenoble Ecole de Management), Ditte Vilstrup Holm (Copenhagen Business School), Pierre Guillet de Monthoux (CBS & SSE), François-Xavier de Vaujany (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL), Jenny Helin (Uppsala University), Wendelin Küpers (Karlshochschule), Géraldine Paring (ESSCA), Paul Richard (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL), Matt Statler (NYU).